November 2026 Report

Ghosted

What Customers Do Before They Leave, and Why Brands Miss It

Idea in brief

Customers rarely leave a bank, insurer or health provider in a single moment. They have a problem, ask about fees, use the product less or move their money out. Then they go. To find out how much of that a provider could see, and whether anyone acted on it, Lorikeet surveyed 1,000 US adults who had chosen to leave a fintech, insurance or health provider in the last 12 months.

The problem

Customers of banks, insurers and health providers take weeks to leave, and they leave signals along the way. Most providers find out when the cancellation arrives.

The stakes

We estimate the average customer who left took about $826 in revenue with them that could have been kept. For a provider that loses 10,000 customers a year, that would be about $8.3m.

The response

Watch for the signals customers already give. Get in touch before they decide, lead with fixing the problem, and remember what they've already told you.

Key findings

72%

took a week or longer to leave. 40% took more than a month.

79%

did something their provider could see before they left, like using it less, asking how to cancel or moving money out.

87%

weren't contacted before they decided to leave. 64% never heard from their provider at all.

76% vs 40%

Among customers still weighing it up, 76% stayed when their provider got in touch and fixed a problem. 40% stayed when it tried to sell them something else.

84%

named one thing that would have kept them. The top answer was "fixing my problem the first time" (19%).

84%

say companies only pay attention to them when they try to leave.

About $826

in revenue that could have been kept, per customer who left (our estimate).

Methodology

Sample: 1,000 US adults who chose to leave or not renew a fintech, insurance or health product in the last 12 months
Panel: a national online research panel
Data collected: October 28, 2026
Products: fintech (592: bank accounts, credit cards, buy now pay later, loans, investing and payments apps), insurance (291: health, car, home, life, pet, travel), health (116: telehealth, therapy apps, pharmacy subscriptions). Respondents answered about the product they left most recently.
Survey: 16 questions, run by Lorikeet, with no brand and no mention of AI. Health questions asked about the service, never about conditions or treatment.
Margin of error: about ±3.1 points for the full sample, wider for subgroups (bases shown)
Stayers: everyone was also asked whether they had seriously thought about leaving a company in these categories, and what they did. 702 had either left or stayed, which lets us compare the two.
Note: people recalling a decision from up to a year ago tend to blame the company, and online panelists lean tech-savvy. Results are unweighted. "What would have kept you" answers are stated intent.

Finding 01Customers take weeks to leave

72% took a week or longer between first thinking about leaving and leaving. 40% took more than a month.

Time from first thinking about leaving to leaving

Base: all respondents (n=1,000)
Same day1 to 6 days1 to 4 weeks1 to 3 monthsMore than 3 monthsNot sure

Few customers leave on impulse: only 7% left the same day.

Finding 02They show it

79% did something their provider could see before they left

What customers did before leaving

32%
Used it less
24%
Asked about fees or how to cancel
22%
Moved money out or stopped autopay
18%
Contacted them more than once about the same problem
15%
Had to explain their situation again
15%
Contacted them once about a problem
11%
Made a formal complaint
9%
Missed a payment or appointment
7%
Downgraded
7%
Gave a low rating

Base: all respondents (n=1,000). Respondents could pick more than one.

The most common signals were quiet ones: using the product less, asking about fees or how to cancel and moving money out or stopping autopay. 59% did both: they took a week or longer, and they left a signal along the way.

Customers who got in touch about a problem often had to keep trying. 56% of them contacted their provider more than once about the same problem. 30% had to explain their situation again each time.

Finding 03Almost none heard from their provider in time

87% weren't contacted before they decided to leave. 64% never heard from their provider at all.

87%

weren't contacted before they decided to leave

64%

never heard from their provider at all

Before they cancelled, did the provider get in touch?

Yes, before they'd decidedOnly after they'd decidedNo

Base: all respondents (n=1,000). 1% weren't sure.

Weren't contacted before they decided, by category

85%
Fintech (n=592)
92%
Insurance (n=291)
80%
Health (n=116)
0%25%50%75%100%

Finding 04When providers do get in touch, what they say matters

Among customers still weighing it up, 76% stayed when their provider fixed a problem. 40% stayed when it tried to sell them something else.

Stay rate by what the provider did, among people still thinking about it or looking around

76%
Fixed a problem (n=59)
55%
Offered a discount (n=100)
53%
Checked in (n=36)
51%
Suggested a cheaper plan (n=86)
51%
Explained a change (n=57)
40%
Tried to sell something else (n=45)
0%25%50%75%100%

61%: didn't get in touch first (n=136), shown as a reference line.

Among the 702 people who had seriously thought about leaving, 41% of those contacted first stayed, against 26% of those who weren't. That gap shrinks to almost nothing when we compare people who had got equally far in their decision. People who were contacted first were more often still early, only thinking about it or looking around. The survey can't tell us whether getting in touch kept them early, or whether providers reached people who happened to be there.

What the provider said made a clearer difference. Among people still thinking about leaving or looking around, fixing a problem was the only kind of contact with a higher stay rate than no contact at all (76% vs 61%). Trying to sell something else had the lowest (40%).

86%

of the 126 people who stayed after their provider got in touch say it changed their mind fully or partly. 31% say they would have left otherwise.

Bases for this finding are small, so treat the gaps as directional.

Finding 05Customers say one fix would have kept them

84% named one thing that would have kept them. Most picked something the provider already had.

Most likely to have kept them

19%
Fixing my problem the first time
16%
Telling me about a cheaper plan they already had
11%
Matching a competitor's price
10%
Better product
8%
Easier to reach
6%
Faster decision
6%
Checking in
4%
Explaining a price rise
2%
Appointment sooner
16%
Nothing

Within the provider's reach   A matched price or a better product

The top answer was fixing the problem the first time (19%), followed by being told about a cheaper plan or better fit the provider already had (16%). Of the people who named a fix, 72% picked something within the provider's reach. 26% wanted a matched price or a better product.

65% of people who named a fix say they would definitely or probably have stayed if their provider had done it before they decided.

Insurance customers were the most likely to name a cheaper plan the insurer already had (28%). Fintech and health customers were the most likely to name fixing the problem the first time (20% and 21%).

Finding 06Customers feel they only get attention on the way out

84% say companies only pay attention to them when they try to leave. 87% say their old provider treated them like every other customer.

Which statement is closer to your view?

Only pay attention when I try to leavePay attention the whole time
Treated me like every other customerUnderstood what I was trying to achieve
Had no way of knowing I was unhappyHad what it needed to see I was unhappy

We asked people to choose between paired statements. 54% agreed strongly that companies only pay attention when they try to leave. 61% agreed strongly that their old provider treated them like every other customer.

Most customers (58%) don't think their provider could have known they were unhappy. Yet 79% did something their provider could see.

Finding 07The revenue that walked out the door

We estimate the average customer who left took about $826 in revenue with them that could have been kept

$826

in revenue that could have been kept, per customer who left (our estimate)

$8.3m

For a provider that loses 10,000 customers a year, about $8.3m

For each respondent we multiplied what they paid a year, how much longer they say they would have stayed, the chance the fix would have worked, and whether the provider could have caught them in time (they took a week or longer, left a signal and weren't contacted before deciding). We used the high end of each band. Open-ended answers count at their lower limit: $500 or more a month counts as $500, and more than 5 years counts as 5 years.

The average is $826 across the 765 respondents who paid something and gave an amount, or $658 if customers who paid nothing directly are counted as zero. Most respondents contribute nothing to it. A small group of high-spending customers who say they would have stayed for years make up most of the total. For a provider that loses 10,000 customers a year, $826 each would be about $8.3m. This is an illustration of the maths, not a forecast. A provider's own revenue per customer gives a better figure.

Bank accounts and investing apps undercount, because customers there often pay no fees directly.

In their own words

We asked everyone to finish the sentence "I would have stayed if they had just...". About 4 in 10 answers mentioned price, fees or rates. Most of the rest were about service: being reachable, listening, fixing the problem and getting in touch.

“fixed the problem I was facing before i made a decision”
“notified me that I was eligible for a lower rate than what I was paying and initiated the discount.”
“had reached out to me immediately i made my complaint to the brand, instead they decided to reply my message weeks after”
“Suggested some alternative coverages before I had shopped around.”
“Not have to explain myself every single time”
“contacted me earlier on before increasing my monthly subscription”
“Contacted me about the problem I had indicated earlier and explained what they can do to avoid that in the future”
“Actively listened to me and didn’t waste my time making me repeat myself.”
“Offered me a better plan with a lower rate or customized to my situation in my life.”

What leaders should do now

What acting in the window means

A provider that acts in the window notices the signals customers already give: lower usage, questions about fees or cancelling, money moving out, the same problem raised twice. It gets in touch before the customer decides. It leads with fixing the problem. It remembers what the customer has already said, so they don't have to explain it again.

Five priorities follow from the data.

01

Treat the weeks before a cancellation as the retention window.

72% of customers took a week or longer to leave. That is time to act.

02

Watch the signals you already have.

79% did something their provider could see. Usage drops, cancellation questions, money moving out and repeat contacts are all in your systems today.

03

Get in touch before they decide.

87% heard nothing before they made up their mind. A message that arrives after the decision is too late for most.

04

Lead with the fix.

Fixing a problem had the highest stay rate of any kind of contact. Trying to sell something else had the lowest.

05

Stop making customers repeat themselves.

30% of customers who got in touch about a problem had to explain their situation again each time.

Ask Claude about the report

Add the Claude skill and ask your own questions, or describe how you handle customers who are thinking of leaving and get a scorecard against the report’s findings.

Get the Claude skill →

Lorikeet Dreamweaver

Lorikeet Dreamweaver increases customer lifetime value by giving every customer their own account manager.

$1,000 of free credits for the first 100 sign-ups